When Any Flagship is released, there will be News about this Score everywhere, but is this 100% correct? Spreading News is the job of every website. So, don’t conclude that everybody is spreading unnecessary things. But here we want to discuss some myths about this score. Are you about to buy a Smartphone just because DxOMark has ranked it high in their camera testing phase? Please don’t buy it because of the score. The DxOMark may be wrong in camera testing, and we all have different preferences when purchasing a Smartphone based on its camera quality and features. This article will help you understand how the Dxomark rating system works and why you should not only look at the main score when making a purchase decision. In short, we will expose the DxoMark rating system and help you to understand why you should not rely on their rating only.
What is the most important thing you look for when buying a Smartphone? You will probably consider the quality of the camera, RCamerasign, size of the gadget, video-making features, colour scheme, the name of the brand, popularity, and definitely, the online reviews by existing customers. We made our choice with different characteristics, and we all have different preferences. How could we buy a smartphone just because DxOMark ranked it high in their camera testing rating?
Shop Now
Like a smartphone with many features, we look for them when buying one. A mobile camera has many features, too. That’s why looking at the leading score of a Smartphone’s camera is not enough to decide whether to buy it. Other things to consider include flash, exposure, camera, texture feature, and artifacts.
What is DxOMark, and why is there so much News about it?
DxOMark is a part of NewsO Labs that launched this fantastic idea to surprise technology lovers. Their business model is based on testing the results and features of the camera (CameCameracamera, Cameraing smartphones). According to the DxOMark, they do not charge any money to check the camera; they charge a fee to advise camera hardware companies, which is how they earn money.
DxOMark has often been in the News for the limited reviews of some news outlets, and it is believed that they took money to rank them high and increase the sales of mobiles. There isn’t any proof regarding this claim, but still, some people believe that their reviews are not 100% honest every time.
How does DxOMark work?
DxOMark is an independent company that claims to test and write honest camera reviews. According to their official statement, they check every camera by photographing through 50 photography challenges. They do not just take a photo and start writing about the camera quality, but also. Still, they have the images from the camera in various ways, including outdoor and indoor scenes, nature, pictures with and without flash, and night mode.
DxOMark is being trusted because it is committed to testing every camera in the same way. This gives users a quick idea about the camera quality. They also examine the built-in features of the camera, which are used to enhance the quality of the photo, etc. Their score also includes the camera sensor noise, resolution, lens, texture, colour, and exposure ranking. This is why people love to read reviews about cameras on DxOMark.
Should you rely on DxoMark rating?
The quick answer to your question is no. One simple relies on the camera’s rating, according to the DxOMark. Their website is the best place to get some idea about the camera, Cameraality, and features, but using their given score to make a purchase decision is not a good idea in the first place.
Two reasons make us say that you would not rely on their rating, and their rating could be wrong. First, the company’s overall score for a mobile camera may look high, but what about the features they are rating separately? The second reason is its business model. As mentioned earlier, the company sells its services to other mobile brands, which helps them improve the quality of their camera. Camera, there is nothing wrong with that, but somehow we know that no conflict of interest exists when DxoMDxOMark a mobile phone of their customers?
Overall rating vs. the individual rating
The overall rating of a mobile camera is not enough to judge its quality and features. For example, a camera has been rated high because of its overall features, but it is not very good when taking selfies. In contrast, the second camera gets an excellent overall rating but takes selfies well. Tell me which one you selected if your primary motive for using a mobile camera is to take a selfie? You would probably choose the second and the low-rated mobile phone.
Claim Your $1 Domain Now!
So, we must not rely on the overall rating of DxOMark and understand first the reason for buying a mobile phone with a specific camera requirement. Let’s take another example from DxoMark’s website.
The website has given 109 scores to the Huawei Mate 20 Pro camera and 101 to the Google Pixel 3. When we talk about their score, we will find that the Google Pixel 3 scores higher than the Huawei Mate 20 Pro camera. Similarly, these individual scores are further divided into headings like exposure, colour, autofocus, texture, artifacts, and flash.
The Huawei Mate 20 Pro camera has a high overall score, but the Google Pixel 3 has higher artifact scores than the Mate 20 Pro. So, relying on their ratings or ranking is not a good idea until you know your motive for buying a smartphone with a good camera. You are not like our David. 🙂 You know, Pixel 3 is the best camera.
Cameraer and buyer relationship
Foxconn, HTC, Samsung, and Huawei are the primary customers of DxO. The company gives them advice regarding improving the quality of their camera. Camerahis makes DxO bias their opinion, especially when a company makes a camera after consulting with DxO. The company probably does not like to talk negatively about their customers’ products, especially when they are the ones who advised them to bring a specific quality to their products.
Conclusion
The problem is that some mid-techies easily suggest this to others because of scores like this. Here, we are not judging or saying that Dxomark rates wrong or takes money for the increasing rating, but we have to understand that it is not a complete solution provider for choosing a camera. We should all recognise a buyer-seller relationship, in that the service provider is aware of and has limitations and conflicts of interest.
Selva Ganesh is the Chief Editor of this Blog. He is a Computer Science Engineer, An experienced Android Developer, Professional Blogger with 8+ years in the field. He completed courses about Google News Initiative. He runs Android Infotech which offers Problem Solving Articles around the globe.
Some phones perform better than what DxOMark claims, so this makes sense.
Good to know there’s a debate about testing credibility.
Would love to see more independent testing standards discussed.
I agree. My phone scored low but takes amazing photos.
Camera quality is subjective, not just numbers. Great point made here.
I’ve compared DxOMark ratings with actual results, and they don’t always match.
Real-world photography needs real-world testing. Well written!
Finally, someone said it. DxOMark isn’t always the final word.
This gives more insight into why some popular phones score poorly.
Just because a phone scores high doesn’t mean it’s better in daily use.
Interesting perspective, especially for photography lovers.
Perfectly sums up my doubts on DxOMark scoring.
Appreciate this article’s honesty on camera performance assessments.
The transparency in this post is what we need more of in tech reviews.
Glad someone finally questioned DxOMark’s methods. This was needed.
DxOMark does have some useful data, but it shouldn’t be the only metric.
It’s true – lighting, software processing, and user handling all affect results.
Testing environments matter a lot. This article highlights it well.
I always felt DxOMark scores were inconsistent with real-world use.
I’ve noticed newer brands get lower scores unfairly.
DxOMark should revise their testing metrics. Too much bias lately.